🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.